Fact Check: Jimmy Savile Banner Image Is NOT Real Photo From London Rally

Fact Check

  • by: Uliana Malashenko
Fact Check: Jimmy Savile Banner Image Is NOT Real Photo From London Rally Probable AI

Is a viral image of a banner about Jimmy Savile a real photo from the May 16, 2026, anti-immigration rally in London? No, that's not true: Lead Stories didn't find credible news organizations that published the image as part of their rally coverage. Three online AI detectors said the picture was likely generated by AI.

The claim appeared in a post (archived here) published by the @bortinez_ account on X on May 16, 2026. The caption began:

Banner spotted at the Unite the Kingdom protest today. Beyond words 🤦‍♂️

The banner in the attached picture read:

IF JIMMY SAVILE WAS A BLACK MUSLIM NON-BINARY LESBIAN HE WOULD OF [sic] GOT AWAY WITH IT.

This is what the image in the post looked like on X at the time of writing:

image - 2026-05-19T114428.955.png

(Image source: post by @bortinez_ on X.com.)

The picture spread on social media on the day of a mass anti-immigration rally (archived here) in London. Posts alleged that the image showed an authentic banner from that march.

Jimmy Savile (archived here) was a British TV host. After his death decades of sexual abuse were revealed, but, contrary to the banner's implications, he was never convicted of such crimes.

Lead Stories performed multiple reverse image searches on Google, Yandex, Bing and TinEye, but did not find credible media organizations that published the image in question.

There were several inconsistencies. It was unclear how a relatively big and seemingly heavy banner could be carried on a single thin pole by the person in the white hoodie.

One of the banner's top corners showed a bright yellow element connected to nothing and looking different from the banner's design:

Screenshot 2026-05-19 at 2.41.12 PM.png

(Image source: X.com.)

Furthermore, in the background, we see a man with an anatomically incorrect head:

Screenshot 2026-05-19 at 2.38.09 PM.png

(Image source: X.com.)

The InVID verification plugin said that the picture was 99% likely generated by AI:

Screenshot 2026-05-19 at 1.29.24 PM.png

(Image source: InVID.)

AI or Not concluded that the odds of the image being a product of generative AI were 95%:

Screenshot 2026-05-19 at 1.03.36 PM.png

(Image source: AI or Not.)

One more detection tool, Sightengine, ruled that the picture was 99% "likely AI-generated":

Screenshot 2026-05-19 at 1.04.56 PM.png

(Image source: Sightengine.)

Want to inform others about the accuracy of this story?

See who is sharing it (it might even be your friends...) and leave the link in the comments.:


  Uliana Malashenko

Uliana Malashenko joined Lead Stories as a freelance fact checking reporter in March 2022. Since then, she has investigated viral claims about U.S. elections and international conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine, among many other things. Before Lead Stories she spent over a decade working in broadcast and digital journalism, specializing in covering breaking news and politics. She is based in New York.

Read more about or contact Uliana Malashenko

About Us

EFCSN International Fact-Checking Organization

Lead Stories is a fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, misleading, deceptive or inaccurate stories, videos or images going viral on the internet.
Spotted something? Let us know!.

Lead Stories is a:


Subscribe to our newsletter

* indicates required

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from Lead Stories LLC:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

Google Preferred Source

Get more fact-checks in your Google Search results by setting up leadstories.com as one of your preferred sources.

Most Read

Most Recent

Share your opinion