Fact Check: Trump Kissing Woman, Possibly Natalie Harp, on Golf Course -- What We Know

Fact Check

  • by: Sarah Thompson
Fact Check: Trump Kissing Woman, Possibly Natalie Harp, on Golf Course -- What We Know What We Know

Is there proof a photo showing President Donald Trump kissing a woman, possibly his aide Natalie Harp, while golfing is real? Here's what we know: There is no verifiable information, such as a photographer, subjects, date or location associated with the image. Content detectors do not pick up AI signals from the blurry picture. A sharper AI-generated version of the image is also circulating, but the existence of the AI image does not, on its own, mean the blurry image is fake unless the AI version is proven to have been published first.

The image appeared in a post (archived here) by the @HughGStiffy account on X on Sept. 14, 2026. It read:

Trump got caught it seems!!
#smokefleet

This is what the post looked like on X at the time of writing:

kissblurry.jpg

(Image source: post by @HughGStiffy on X.)

A second version of this image (archived here) is also circulating. It is a vertical rectangle that shows more of the subjects' legs and a golf club. The colors of the image are brighter, and unlike the other version, the subjects are in crisp focus. The image has sharp details, notably the woman's gloved right hand -- which has six fingers (pictured below).

crispkiss.jpg

(Image source: post by @MykhailoRohoza on X.)

Lead Stories uploaded this sharp-focus image to the detection tools at Hive Moderation and OpenAI (pictured below). The result from Hive's AI-Generated Content Detection Tool showed the image was 99.9% likely to be AI-generated (archived here), while the OpenAI Verify tool found a SynthID watermark, indicating the image was made with OpenAI tools (archived here).

crispHive.jpg

(Image source: Hive Moderation.)

crispVerify.jpg

(Image source: OpenAI.)

A Sept. 14, 2026, post on X by @MrReaganUSA (archived here) asserts that both versions of the image are fake. However, the post does not say how the account concluded that about the blurry image (embedded below). Lead Stories uploaded the blurry image to Hive Moderation (archived here), OpenAI (archived here) and Google Gemini (archived here). None of these platforms detected signals pointing to AI as the source.

Lead Stories used Google Lens to search for exact matches for the blurry and focused versions (archived here and here) and then platform-specific text-based searches to seek out the earliest copy of the image. If the AI-generated image came first and was the source of the blurry image, then neither image depicts a real event. If the blurry image came first, regardless of whether it is real or fake, it could be the source for the clear AI-generated image.

A failure to detect an AI source does not prove an image is real, and the presence of an AI-generated copy does not prove the source is fake. It is also common for early disinformation posts to be deleted from social media once they begin to spread -- the earliest existing post may not be the first post.

The earliest image Lead Stories identified is the blurry image. It was published on Threads at 4:24 p.m. on Sept. 14, 2026, by the account @moondonkey (archived here). The caption does not credit a photographer or media outlet, nor mention where the image was found. The caption reads:

Here's another one hot off the press,, let's circulate it

Ten minutes later, at 4:34 p.m., the blurry image was published on Facebook by @teri.taylorking (archived here).

If anyone is aware of earlier copies of either image on social media please contact: [email protected]. If the photographer who took this picture -- or someone who knows them -- is reading this, please contact us as well.

Want to inform others about the accuracy of this story?

See who is sharing it (it might even be your friends...) and leave the link in the comments.:


  Sarah Thompson

Sarah Thompson lives with her family and pets on a small farm in Indiana. She founded a Facebook page and a blog called “Exploiting the Niche” in 2017 to help others learn about manipulative tactics and avoid scams on social media. Since then she has collaborated with journalists in the USA, Canada and Australia and since December 2019 she works as a Social Media Authenticity Analyst at Lead Stories.


 

Read more about or contact Sarah Thompson

About Us

EFCSN International Fact-Checking Organization

Lead Stories is a fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, misleading, deceptive or inaccurate stories, videos or images going viral on the internet.
Spotted something? Let us know!.

Lead Stories is a:


Subscribe to our newsletter

* indicates required

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from Lead Stories LLC:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

Google Preferred Source

Get more fact-checks in your Google Search results by setting up leadstories.com as one of your preferred sources.

Most Read

Most Recent

Share your opinion